|   | Entire Volume. | 
      
        |   | Cover. | 
      
        |   | Title pages. (pages i–iv). | 
      
        |   | Frontmatter. (pages v–ix). | 
      
        |   | Mario Alai. How should we judge current scientific theories? (pages 1–15). | 
      
        |   | Bo Chen. Quine’s naturalism: clarification and vindication (pages 17–48). | 
      
        |   | Alberto Cordero. Judgment and the quest for knowledge in science (pages 49–59). | 
      
        |   | Dennis Dieks. Perspectives in physics (pages 61–75). | 
      
        |   | Hans-Peter Grosshans. Judgment in hermeneutics (pages 77–87). | 
      
        |   | Reinhard Kahle. Axiomatic thinking and judgment (pages 89–95). | 
      
        |   | Giovanni Macchia & Gino Tarozzi. Does neopositivist refutation of Kant’s synthetic a priori judgments rule out the possibility of meaningful philosophical principles? (pages 97–116). | 
      
        |   | Fabio Minazzi. On the Wertfreiheit of science: objective knowledge and axiology (pages 117–157). | 
      
        |   | Johan van Benthem. Interfacing logic and judgment (pages 159–166). | 
      
        |   | Jure Zovko. The relevance of judgment for the philosophy of science: reflections from the perspective of Kant’s Third Critique (pages 167–177). |