Logic List Mailing Archive
CfPart "Logic & Deliberation", Rotterdam (The Netherlands) and virtual, 26 & 27 Oct 2021
*Call for Participants (on/offline): Logic and Deliberation (Rotterdam
26-27/10)*
https://www.eur.nl/en/esphil/events/encode-workshop-logic-and-deliberation-2021-10-26
Format: the majority of invited and contributed talks take place on campus, but
a few talks will be given via Zoom and participation via Zoom is also enabled.
*Keynote Speakers: *
·Natacha Alechina (Dept. of Information and Computing Sciences, University of
Utrecht)
·Zoé Christoff (Bernouilli Institute for Mathematics, Computer Science and
Artificial Intelligence <https://www.rug.nl/research/bernoulli/>, University of
Groningen)
·Hannes Leitgeb (Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy,
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München).
·Dominik Klein (Dept. of Philosophy, University of Utrecht)
*Full Programme, incl. abstracts: *see this page
<https://www.dropbox.com/s/zqvj14o1f2733cz/Logic%26Deliberation%20-%20programme%20%26%20abstracts.docx?dl=0>.
*Registration: *In case you would like to participate, please send an email to
Bronagh Dunne <dunne@esphil.eur.nl>. Mind that the number of places available
for on campus participation is limited; these will be distributed on a first
come, first serve basis. Upon registration, you will receive the zoom link and
all practical information regarding the workshop.
_Registration for on campus participation is closed on Wednesday, October 20^th
, 23h55 CET. Registration for online participation closes on Monday, October
25^th , 12h00 CET. _
*Theme & topics*
In contemporary democratic theory and political science, the importance of
group deliberation is stressed over and again. But what exact form should such
deliberation take, and what can we expect from it?
From an abstract perspective, group deliberation is a multi-agent process that
involves two types of dynamics running in parallel. At the social level, there
is the public exchange of beliefs, arguments, preferences and values that are
supposedly relevant to a given decision. At the individual level, there is the
revision of each participant?s personal attitudes, induced by and further
inducing such exchanges, and the (often defeasible, non-monotonic) reasoning
processes guiding such revision. Thus conceived, a plethora of formal methods
from philosophical logic ? broadly speaking ? are relevant to the study of
deliberation as a democratic ideal: i.a. the theory of rational belief
revision; dynamic epistemic logic and logics of information dynamics more
generally; non-monotonic (modal) logic; deontic logic (dealing with
preferences, values, and their interaction with other information).
In this workshop we welcome all presentations on original contributions in
philosophical logic and formal philosophy more generally that are relevant for
the study of deliberative, multi-agent decision processes and procedures.
*Funding & organization: *
The ENCODE workshops are organized bi-annually at the EIPE/ESPhil (Erasmus
University of Rotterdam), as part of the NWO-funded ENCODE
<https://www.eur.nl/en/esphil/encode>project (VI.Vidi.191.105).
--
Frederik Van De Putte
Assistant Professor, Erasmus Institute for Philosophy & Economics / Erasmus
School of Philosophy / Erasmus University Rotterdam
Postdoctoral Research Fellow of the Research Foundation Flanders
(FWO-Vlaanderen), Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science / Department of
Philosophy and Moral Science / Ghent University
https://frederikvandeputte.weebly.com/
NWO-funded VIDI project: Explicating Norms of Collective Deliberation (ENCODE)
--
[LOGIC] mailing list
http://www.dvmlg.de/mailingliste.html
Archive: http://www.illc.uva.nl/LogicList/
provided by a collaboration of the DVMLG, the Maths Departments in Bonn and Hamburg, and the ILLC at the Universiteit van Amsterdam