Logic List Mailing Archive

CfP special issue on "Mereology & Identity" in Synthese, Deadline: 31 May 2018

*Call for Papers: **A reminder*


As written, we invite submissions of original papers for a special issue of
*Synthese*, whose title is ?Mereology and Identity? (
https://sites.google.com/view/mereology-and-identity)

The special issue will focus on the relation among parthood, composition
and identity and will be edited by Massimiliano Carrara (University of
Padua) and Giorgio Lando (University of L?Aquila).


*Scientific Aims*

The contemporary debate on mereology is largely hinged on the notion of
identity. Indeed, classical mereology dictates that complex entities are
identical if and only if they have the same proper parts. On the other

  hand, many scholars who doubt the adequacy of classical mereology point to
real or fictional cases in which different wholes would have the same
proper parts.

The upholders of the so-called doctrine of Composition as Identity think
that identity, or a relation analogous to identity, also connects a whole
with its parts. By contrast, the opponents of this doctrine retort that

  composition fails to respect some pivotal principles that hold for
standard identity, such as the Indiscerniblity of Identicals,
co-referentiality or transitivity. Finally, in the debate about Composition
as Identity, the so-called Sider-Yi Collapse seems

  to show that some roles sometimes attributed to identity in this debate
are incompatible with the standard characterization of plural identity.

Aim of the issue is to give innovative solutions to the following open
problems concerning mereology and identity. We welcome submission on any of
the following topics:


a) Is there any inferential or evidential connection between Composition as
Identity and mereological principles?

b) Does the debate between monism and dualism in the theory of constitution
really concern mereology? Is dualism compatible or incompatible with
mereological extensionalism?

c) Is it possible and interesting to combine mereological extensionalism
and/or Composition as Identity with non-standard doctrines of identity,
such as relative identity or milder forms of pluralism about identity?

d) What does the Yi/Sider Collapse show about the application of plural
logic to mereology?

e) How do the appeals to the Indiscernibility of Identicals in the debate
about Composition as Identity differ from the appeals to the
Indiscernibility of Identicals in the debate about the theory of
constitution?

f) Is Composition as Identity compatible with non-standard mereologies, or
with pluralist theories of parthood?

g) According to Composition as Identity the Principle of Indiscernibility
of Identicals can be extended to composition, by resorting to broadly
Fregean relativizations of cardinality ascriptions. How is this
relativization

  achieved?


*Practical Informations*


The deadline for the submission of the papers is *May 31st 2018*. The
papers should be prepared for blind review. The paper should be submitted
through Synthese editorial manager. Here
<https://philevents.org/event/fileDownload/38542?fileId=4422> you can find
some instructions.


For any further informations, contacts massimiliano.carrara@unipd.it or
giorgio.lando@univaq.it

or visit the CFP web page:

https://sites.google.com/view/mereology-and-identity



Massimiliano Carrara and Giorgio Lando
--
[LOGIC] mailing list
http://www.dvmlg.de/mailingliste.html
Archive: http://www.illc.uva.nl/LogicList/

provided by a collaboration of the DVMLG, the Maths Departments in Bonn and Hamburg, and the ILLC at the Universiteit van Amsterdam